IPUMS.org Home Page

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Publications, working papers, and other research using data resources from IPUMS.

Full Citation

Title: Government data v. ground observation for food-environment assessment: businesses missed and misreported by city and state inspection records

Citation Type: Journal Article

Publication Year: 2020

ISSN: 1368-9800

DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019002982

PMID: 31680658

Abstract: Objective:To assess the accuracy of government inspection records, relative to ground observation, for identifying businesses offering foods/drinks.Design:Agreement between city and state inspection records v. ground observations at two levels: businesses and street segments. Agreement could be ‘strict’ (by business name, e.g. ‘Rizzo’s’) or ‘lenient’ (by business type, e.g. ‘pizzeria’); using sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for businesses and using sensitivity, PPV, specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) for street segments.Setting:The Bronx and the Upper East Side (UES), New York City, USA.Participants:All food/drink-offering businesses on sampled street segments (n 154 in the Bronx, n 51 in the UES).Results:By ‘strict’ criteria, sensitivity and PPV of government records for food/drink-offering businesses were 0·37 and 0·57 in the Bronx; 0·58 and 0·60 in the UES. ‘Lenient’ values were 0·40 and 0·62 in the Bronx; 0·60 and 0·62 in the UES. Sensitivity, PPV, specificity and NPV of government records for street segments having food/drink-offering businesses were 0·66, 0·73, 0·84 and 0·79 in the Bronx; 0·79, 0·92, 0·67, and 0·40 in the UES. In both areas, agreement varied by business category: restaurants; ‘food stores’; and government-recognized other storefront businesses (‘gov. OSB’, i.e. dollar stores, gas stations, pharmacies). Additional business categories – ‘other OSB’ (barbers, laundromats, newsstands, etc.) and street vendors – were absent from government records; together, they represented 28·4 % of all food/drink-offering businesses in the Bronx, 22·2 % in the UES (‘other OSB’ and street vendors were sources of both healthful and less-healthful foods/drinks in both areas).Conclusions:Government records frequently miss or misrepresent businesses offering foods/drinks, suggesting caveats for food-environment assessments using such records.

Url: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/government-data-v-ground-observation-for-foodenvironment-assessment-businesses-missed-and-misreported-by-city-and-state-inspection-records/32CCD2442CAF8843FCC7594A831422B8

User Submitted?: No

Authors: Lucan, Sean C.; Maroko, Andrew R.; Abrams, Courtney; Rodriguez, Noemi; Patel, Achint N.; Gjonbalaj, Ilirjan; Schechter, Clyde B.; Elbel, Brian

Periodical (Full): Public Health Nutrition

Issue: 8

Volume: 23

Pages: 1414-1427

Data Collections: IPUMS NHGIS

Topics: Health, Natural Resource Management

Countries:

IPUMS NHGIS NAPP IHIS ATUS Terrapop