Full Citation

Title: Congressional Representation by Petition: Assessing the Voices of the Voteless in a Comprehensive New Database, 1789–1949

Citation Type: Journal Article

Publication Year: 2020

ISBN:

ISSN: 19399162

DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12305

NSFID:

PMCID:

PMID:

Abstract: For much of American political history, the electoral franchise was restricted to only a portion of the population. By contrast, the right to petition was considered universal and enshrined in the First Amendment, giving voice to the voteless. Petitioning thus served as a fundamental mechanism of representation. Still, fundamental questions remain: How was petitioning used, how did Congress respond to petitions, and did the petition allow for partial representation of the marginalized and unenfranchised? We address these questions by analyzing the Congressional Petitions Database (CPD), an original endeavor tracking virtually every petition introduced to Congress from 1789 to 1949. Our analyses document how (1) two important groups of unenfranchised constituents—Native Americans and women—petitioned regularly and (2) Congress's initial treatment of Natives' and women's petitions was similar to that of all others, thus offering systematic evidence highlighting the petition's role as a mechanism for representation among otherwise unenfranchised groups.

Url: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/lsq.12305

Url: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lsq.12305

Url: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsq.12305

User Submitted?: No

Authors: Blackhawk, Maggie; Carpenter, Daniel; Resch, Tobias; Schneer, Benjamin

Periodical (Full): Legislative Studies Quarterly

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

Data Collections: IPUMS USA

Topics: Population Data Science

Countries: